You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Epidemiological investigation of foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks in a Vietnamese bear rescue centre
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2024.1389029 |
| Authors |
Anna B. Ludi, Hannah Baker, Rachel Sanki, Rosanne M. F. De Jong, Julie Maryan, Martin Walker, Donald P. King, Simon Gubbins, Georgina Limon, Kirsty Officer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Argentina | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2024.
All research outputs
#15,296,187
of 26,166,431 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#2,196
of 8,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,603
of 150,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#8
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,166,431 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.