The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mule trains to mountain roads: the role of working mules in supporting resilient communities in the Himalayas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2024.1390644 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura M. Kubasiewicz, Tamlin Watson, Sajana Thapa, Caroline Nye, Natasha Chamberlain |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2024.
All research outputs
#15,629,095
of 26,458,381 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#2,368
of 8,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,953
of 171,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#21
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,458,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.