↓ Skip to main content

Identification of two novel linear epitopes on the E165R protein of African swine fever virus recognized by monoclonal antibodies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, August 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of two novel linear epitopes on the E165R protein of African swine fever virus recognized by monoclonal antibodies
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, August 2024
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2024.1392350
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jian He, Jieqiong Li, Mingzhan Luo, Yangkun Liu, Jingchen Sun, Lunguang Yao

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2024.
All research outputs
#20,802,817
of 26,427,317 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#4,873
of 8,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,206
of 131,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#39
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,427,317 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.