↓ Skip to main content

Realities, perceptions, and strategies for implementation of an ethical population management program for dogs and cats on university campuses

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Realities, perceptions, and strategies for implementation of an ethical population management program for dogs and cats on university campuses
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, July 2024
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2024.1408795
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gustavo Canesso Bicalho, Lucas Belchior Souza de Oliveira, Camila Stefanie Fonseca de Oliveira, Adriane Pimenta Da Costa Val Bicalho, Camila Valgas Bastos, Camila Machado Torres, Christina Malm, Fernanda Louro de Souza, Graciela Kunrath Lima, Lorena Diniz Macedo Silva Maia, Luiz Carlos Villalta, Marcelo Pires Nogueira de Carvalho, Rossimiriam Pereira de Freitas, Vania Regina Goveia, Werik dos Santos Barrado, Yara de Freitas Oliveira, Danielle Ferreira de Magalhães Soares

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2024.
All research outputs
#23,827,442
of 26,521,103 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#7,194
of 8,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,516
of 228,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#99
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,521,103 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.