↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of agreement for radiographic lesions and risk for racing on thoroughbred yearling sale repository radiographs Authorship

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, August 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of agreement for radiographic lesions and risk for racing on thoroughbred yearling sale repository radiographs Authorship
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, August 2024
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2024.1430993
Authors

Argue, Brodie J., Ahern, Benjamin J.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2024.
All research outputs
#21,630,427
of 26,554,122 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#5,688
of 8,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,698
of 139,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#48
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,554,122 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,568 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.