The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Quantitative proteomic analysis and replacement therapy identifies haptoglobin as a therapeutic target in a murine model of SLE-associated diffuse alveolar hemorrhage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2024.1431738 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ninghui Yan, Chenyi Shao, Yan Zhen, Xueliang Zhang, Nana Xia, Qiang Guo |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2024.
All research outputs
#23,764,272
of 26,452,360 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#7,223
of 8,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,794
of 132,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#110
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,452,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.