↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Alternative and novel livestock feed: reducing environmental impact

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Alternative and novel livestock feed: reducing environmental impact
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, July 2024
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2024.1441905
Authors

Alessandro Vastolo, Francesco Serrapica, Damiano Cavallini, Isa Fusaro, Alberto Stanislo Atzori, Massimo Todaro

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2024.
All research outputs
#21,462,782
of 26,338,415 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#5,583
of 8,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,324
of 137,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#31
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,338,415 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,387 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.