↓ Skip to main content

The Corona Immunitas Digital Follow-Up eCohort to Monitor Impacts of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in Switzerland: Study Protocol and First Results

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Public Health, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Corona Immunitas Digital Follow-Up eCohort to Monitor Impacts of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in Switzerland: Study Protocol and First Results
Published in
International Journal of Public Health, February 2022
DOI 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604506
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandre Speierer, Patricia O. Chocano-Bedoya, Daniela Anker, Alexia Schmid, Dirk Keidel, Thomas Vermes, Medea Imboden, Sara Levati, Giovanni Franscella, Laurie Corna, Rebecca Amati, Erika Harju, Chantal Luedi, Gisela Michel, Caroline Veys-Takeuchi, Claire Zuppinger, Semira Gonseth Nusslé, Valérie D’Acremont, Ismaël Tall, Éric Salberg, Hélène Baysson, Elsa Lorthe, Francesco Pennacchio, Anja Frei, Marco Kaufmann, Marco Geigges, Erin Ashley West, Nathalie Schwab, Stéphane Cullati, Arnaud Chiolero, Christian Kahlert, Silvia Stringhini, Fabian Vollrath, Nicole Probst-Hensch, Nicolas Rodondi, Milo A. Puhan, Viktor von Wyl

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 13%
Researcher 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 14 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 4 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Social Sciences 4 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 14 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,966,302
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Public Health
#821
of 1,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,011
of 450,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Public Health
#22
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.