The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sharing with Python
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.3389/neuro.01.037.2009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gaute T. Einevoll |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 21% |
| Researcher | 4 | 21% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 16% |
| Professor | 3 | 16% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 26% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 26% |
| Engineering | 2 | 11% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2009.
All research outputs
#5,839,162
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,895
of 9,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,974
of 163,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#13
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.