↓ Skip to main content

Neural correlates of fluid reasoning in children and adults

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neural correlates of fluid reasoning in children and adults
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, March 2008
DOI 10.3389/neuro.09.008.2007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samantha B Wright, Bryan J Matlen, Carol L Baym, Emilio Ferrer, Silvia A Bunge

Abstract

Fluid reasoning, or the capacity to think logically and solve novel problems, is central to the development of human cognition, but little is known about the underlying neural changes. During the acquisition of event-related fMRI data, children aged 6-13 (N = 16) and young adults (N = 17) performed a task in which they were asked to identify semantic relationships between drawings of common objects. On semantic problems, participants indicated which of five objects was most closely semantically related to a cued object. On analogy problems, participants solved a visual propositional analogy (e.g., shoe is to foot as glove is to...?) by indicating which of four objects would complete the problem; these problems required integration of two semantic relations, or relational integration. Our prior research on analogical reasoning in adults implicated left anterior ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) in the controlled retrieval of individual semantic relationships, and rostrolateral prefrontal cortex (RLPFC) in relational integration. In this study, age-related changes in the recruitment of VLPFC, temporal cortex, and other cortical regions were observed during the retrieval of individual semantic relations. In contrast, age-related changes in RLPFC function were observed during relational integration. Children aged 6-13 engage RLPFC too late in the analogy trials to influence their behavioral responses, suggesting that important changes in RLPFC function take place during adolescence.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 153 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 25%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 12%
Student > Master 18 11%
Professor 11 7%
Other 32 20%
Unknown 20 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 90 55%
Neuroscience 11 7%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 29 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,307
of 7,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,632
of 95,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.