↓ Skip to main content

Babies and brains: habituation in infant cognition and functional neuroimaging

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Babies and brains: habituation in infant cognition and functional neuroimaging
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, December 2008
DOI 10.3389/neuro.09.016.2008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas B Turk-Browne, Brian J Scholl, Marvin M Chun

Abstract

Many prominent studies of infant cognition over the past two decades have relied on the fact that infants habituate to repeated stimuli - i.e. that their looking times tend to decline upon repeated stimulus presentations. This phenomenon had been exploited to reveal a great deal about the minds of preverbal infants. Many prominent studies of the neural bases of adult cognition over the past decade have relied on the fact that brain regions habituate to repeated stimuli - i.e. that the hemodynamic responses observed in fMRI tend to decline upon repeated stimulus presentations. This phenomenon has been exploited to reveal a great deal about the neural mechanisms of perception and cognition. Similarities in the mechanics of these two forms of habituation suggest that it may be useful to relate them to each other. Here we outline this analogy, explore its nuances, and highlight some ways in which the study of habituation in functional neuroimaging could yield novel insights into the nature of habituation in infant cognition - and vice versa.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
Italy 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 221 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 21%
Researcher 52 21%
Student > Master 30 12%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Professor 17 7%
Other 43 18%
Unknown 28 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 121 50%
Neuroscience 26 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 4%
Linguistics 8 3%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 43 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2016.
All research outputs
#2,267,592
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,058
of 7,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,544
of 179,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them