↓ Skip to main content

Neuroplasticity Associated with Tactile Language Communication in a Deaf-Blind Subject

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuroplasticity Associated with Tactile Language Communication in a Deaf-Blind Subject
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2010
DOI 10.3389/neuro.09.060.2009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Souzana Obretenova, Mark A. Halko, Ela B. Plow, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Lotfi B. Merabet

Abstract

A long-standing debate in cognitive neuroscience pertains to the innate nature of language development and the underlying factors that determine this faculty. We explored the neural correlates associated with language processing in a unique individual who is early blind, congenitally deaf, and possesses a high level of language function. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we compared the neural networks associated with the tactile reading of words presented in Braille, Print on Palm (POP), and a haptic form of American Sign Language (haptic ASL or hASL). With all three modes of tactile communication, indentifying words was associated with robust activation within occipital cortical regions as well as posterior superior temporal and inferior frontal language areas (lateralized within the left hemisphere). In a normally sighted and hearing interpreter, identifying words through hASL was associated with left-lateralized activation of inferior frontal language areas however robust occipital cortex activation was not observed. Diffusion tensor imaging -based tractography revealed differences consistent with enhanced occipital-temporal connectivity in the deaf-blind subject. Our results demonstrate that in the case of early onset of both visual and auditory deprivation, tactile-based communication is associated with an extensive cortical network implicating occipital as well as posterior superior temporal and frontal associated language areas. The cortical areas activated in this deaf-blind subject are consistent with characteristic cortical regions previously implicated with language. Finally, the resilience of language function within the context of early and combined visual and auditory deprivation may be related to enhanced connectivity between relevant cortical areas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 5%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Sweden 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 118 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 20%
Student > Master 20 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 8%
Professor 7 5%
Other 28 21%
Unknown 12 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 32 24%
Neuroscience 19 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 12%
Social Sciences 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 23 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2014.
All research outputs
#17,681,263
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#5,699
of 7,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,420
of 163,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#51
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.