↓ Skip to main content

Python for information theoretic analysis of neural data

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Python for information theoretic analysis of neural data
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, February 2009
DOI 10.3389/neuro.11.004.2009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robin A. A Ince, Rasmus S Petersen, Daniel C Swan, Stefano Panzeri

Abstract

Information theory, the mathematical theory of communication in the presence of noise, is playing an increasingly important role in modern quantitative neuroscience. It makes it possible to treat neural systems as stochastic communication channels and gain valuable, quantitative insights into their sensory coding function. These techniques provide results on how neurons encode stimuli in a way which is independent of any specific assumptions on which part of the neuronal response is signal and which is noise, and they can be usefully applied even to highly non-linear systems where traditional techniques fail. In this article, we describe our work and experiences using Python for information theoretic analysis. We outline some of the algorithmic, statistical and numerical challenges in the computation of information theoretic quantities from neural data. In particular, we consider the problems arising from limited sampling bias and from calculation of maximum entropy distributions in the presence of constraints representing the effects of different orders of interaction in the system. We explain how and why using Python has allowed us to significantly improve the speed and domain of applicability of the information theoretic algorithms, allowing analysis of data sets characterized by larger numbers of variables. We also discuss how our use of Python is facilitating integration with collaborative databases and centralised computational resources.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 13 5%
United States 9 3%
Germany 6 2%
Sweden 3 1%
Brazil 3 1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 206 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 29%
Researcher 74 28%
Student > Master 23 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 6%
Student > Bachelor 14 5%
Other 41 16%
Unknown 19 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 26%
Neuroscience 45 17%
Computer Science 34 13%
Engineering 22 8%
Physics and Astronomy 21 8%
Other 51 20%
Unknown 21 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2013.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#597
of 833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,164
of 189,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.