↓ Skip to main content

Bio-Engineering of Pre-Vascularized Islet Organoids for the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Transplant International, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bio-Engineering of Pre-Vascularized Islet Organoids for the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes
Published in
Transplant International, January 2022
DOI 10.3389/ti.2021.10214
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles-Henri Wassmer, Fanny Lebreton, Kevin Bellofatto, Lisa Perez, David Cottet-Dumoulin, Axel Andres, Domenico Bosco, Thierry Berney, Véronique Othenin-Girard, Begoña Martinez De Tejada, Marie Cohen, Christina Olgasi, Antonia Follenzi, Ekaterine Berishvili, the VANGUARD Consortium, Chiara Borsotti, Simone Merlin, Lorenzo Piemonti, Antonio Citro, Silvia Pellegrini, Jochen Seissler, Lelia Wolf-van Buerck, Mohsen Honarpisheh, Olivier Thaunat, Emma Massey, Antonia Cronin, Eline Bunnik, Dide de Jongh, Luca Segantini, Giovanna Rossi, Patrick Kugelmeier, Petra Wolint, Marco Cavallaro, Julia Götz, Jeanette Müller

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Master 4 12%
Researcher 2 6%
Professor 1 3%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 19 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 21 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,199,096
of 26,550,749 outputs
Outputs from Transplant International
#211
of 1,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,858
of 533,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transplant International
#3
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,550,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 533,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.