Niels L. Riemersma, Daan Kremer, Tim J. Knobbe, C. Tji Gan, Svea Nolte, António W. Gomes-Neto, Hans Blokzijl, Vincent E. de Meijer, Kevin Damman, Michele F. Eisenga, Gea Drost, Jan Willem J. Elting, Daan J. Touw, Stefan P. Berger, Stephan J. L. Bakker, A. M. Madelein van der Stouwe, Transplantlines Investigators, Coby Annema, Stephan J. L. Bakker, Stefan P. Berger, Hans Blokzijl, Frank A. J. A. Bodewes, Marieke T. de Boer, Kevin Damman, Martin H. de Borst, Arjanx Arjan, Gerard Dijkstra, Caecilia S. E. Doorenbos, Rianne M. Douwes, Michele F. Eisenga, Michele E. Erasmus, C. Tji Gan, Antonio W. Gomes Neto, Eelko Hak, Bouke G. Hepkema, Klont Frank, Tim J. Knobbe, Daan Kremer, Henri G. D. Leuvenink, Willem S. Lexmond, Vincent E. de Meijer, Hubert G. M. Niesters, Gertrude J. Nieuwenhuijs - Moeke, L. Joost van Pelt, Robert A. Pol, Adelita V. Ranchor, Jan Stephan F. Sanders, Marion J. Siebelink, Riemer J. H. J. A. Slart, J. Casper Swarte, Daan J. Touw, Marius C. van den Heuvel, Coretta van Leer-Buter, Marco van Londen, Erik A. M. Verschuuren, Michel J. Vos, Rinse K. Weersma
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
1
6%
Unknown
8
50%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2023.
All research outputs
#17,301,727
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Transplant International
#1,406
of 1,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,729
of 427,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transplant International
#24
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
