↓ Skip to main content

Lymphocytic Hypophysitis with Diabetes Insipidus: Improvement by Methylprednisolone Pulse Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lymphocytic Hypophysitis with Diabetes Insipidus: Improvement by Methylprednisolone Pulse Therapy
Published in
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, September 2004
DOI 10.3904/kjim.2004.19.3.189
Pubmed ID
Authors

Young-Suk Jo, Hyo-Jin Lee, So-Young Rha, Woo-Jung Hong, Chang-June Song, Young-Kun Kim, Heung-Kyu Ro

Abstract

Lymphocytic hypophysitis is a rare inflammatory disorder in the pituitary gland. The lesion is usually confined to the adenohypophysis. Although the involvement of the posterior pituitary gland or the stalk is rare, such patients with diabetes insipidus have been reported. Surgery has been used to make the definitive diagnosis. Recent studies suggest, however, that the pathologic diagnosis may not be necessary always. We reported a case of Lymphocytic hypophysitis managed by methylprednisolone pulse therapy. A 50-year-old premenopausal woman with Lymphocytic hypophysitis and diabetes insipidus was treated with methylprednisolone pulse therapy. Her adenopituitary lesion disappeared and the diabetes insipidus resolved. The optimal management for patients with lymphocytic hypophysitis may be the high index of the suspicion prior to the extensive surgical resection. In addition, methylprednisolone pulse therapy may improve the clinical and MRI findings.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 13%
Lecturer 2 13%
Librarian 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 5 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 60%
Neuroscience 1 7%
Unknown 5 33%