↓ Skip to main content

Developing the Symptoms and Functional Impairment Rating Scale: A Multi-Dimensional ADHD Scale

Overview of attention for article published in Psychiatry Investigation, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing the Symptoms and Functional Impairment Rating Scale: A Multi-Dimensional ADHD Scale
Published in
Psychiatry Investigation, January 2018
DOI 10.4306/pi.2018.15.1.13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yasong Du, Mengyao Li, Wenqing Jiang, Yan Li, David. R. Coghill

Abstract

This research developed a practical, multi-dimensional attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) rating scale (i.e., the Symptoms and Functional Impairment Rating Scale, SFIRS) for Chinese children, aged 6-12 years, with ADHD. The structural validity, criterion validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability of the scale were evaluated. Item screening was conducted with 412 ADHD patients and 322 developmentally typical controls. The scale includes 44 items, divided among Hyperactivity-Impulsivity, Self-Control, Inattention, Self-Management, Academic Performance, and Social Interaction. The six-factor model showed good data fit, with each factor significantly correlated with its corresponding criterion (r=0.690-0.841). The Cronbach's α of the full scale was 0.976. Total score test-retest reliability was r=0.816 (p<0.01). The SFIRS thus demonstrated good reliability and validity and may be used to assess ADHD among children aged 6-12 years in China.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 20%
Student > Master 5 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 8 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Computer Science 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 40%