↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of Aquatic Treadmill Training on Gait Symmetry and Balance in Subacute Stroke Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy of Aquatic Treadmill Training on Gait Symmetry and Balance in Subacute Stroke Patients
Published in
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, June 2017
DOI 10.5535/arm.2017.41.3.376
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mi Eun Lee, Geun Yeol Jo, Hwan Kwon, Hee Eun Choi, Woo Jin Kim

Abstract

To determine the efficacy of aquatic treadmill training (ATT) as a new modality for stroke rehabilitation, by assessing changes in gait symmetry, balance function, and subjective balance confidence for the paretic and non-paretic leg in stroke patients. Twenty-one subacute stroke patients participated in 15 intervention sessions of aquatic treadmill training. The Comfortable 10-Meter Walk Test (CWT), spatiotemporal gait parameters, Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale (ABC) were assessed pre- and post-interventions. From pre- to post-intervention, statistically significant improvements were observed in the CWT (0.471±0.21 to 0.558±0.23, p<0.001), BBS (39.66±8.63 to 43.80±5.21, p<0.001), and ABC (38.39±13.46 to 46.93±12.32, p<0.001). The step-length symmetry (1.017±0.25 to 0.990±0.19, p=0.720) and overall temporal symmetry (1.404±0.36 to 1.314±0.34, p=0.218) showed improvement without statistical significance. ATT improves the functional aspects of gait, including CWT, BBS and ABC, and spatiotemporal gait symmetry, though without statistical significance. Further studies are required to examine and compare the potential benefits of ATT as a new modality for stroke therapy, with other modalities.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 24%
Student > Master 13 12%
Other 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 39 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 35 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 16%
Sports and Recreations 4 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 41 38%