↓ Skip to main content

実験室から「相互の係わりあい」の民族誌へ ポスト‐アクターネットワーク理論の展開とダナ・ハラウェイに注目して

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal for Science, Technology & Society, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
実験室から「相互の係わりあい」の民族誌へ ポスト‐アクターネットワーク理論の展開とダナ・ハラウェイに注目して
Published in
Japanese Journal for Science, Technology & Society, July 2021
DOI 10.32189/jjsts.29.0_3
Authors

鈴木 和歌奈

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,760,272
of 26,222,113 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal for Science, Technology & Society
#3
of 14 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,340
of 458,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal for Science, Technology & Society
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,222,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one scored the same or higher as 11 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them