The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
フライドチキンの骨学(<特集>古生物学入門)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Chigakukyoiku and Kagaku-undo, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.15080/chitoka.19.0_39 |
| Authors |
間島 信男 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,295,770
of 26,243,859 outputs
Outputs from Chigakukyoiku and Kagaku-undo
#6
of 50 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,494
of 347,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chigakukyoiku and Kagaku-undo
#4
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one scored the same or higher as 44 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.