↓ Skip to main content

植物由来食物による口腔アレルギー症候群63例の検討 : 原因食物ごとの皮膚試験と特異IgE測定における陽性率の比較及び花粉感作状況について

Overview of attention for article published in Arerugī Allergy, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
植物由来食物による口腔アレルギー症候群63例の検討 : 原因食物ごとの皮膚試験と特異IgE測定における陽性率の比較及び花粉感作状況について
Published in
Arerugī Allergy, February 2017
DOI 10.15036/arerugi.56.1276
Authors

猪又 直子, 守田 亜希子, 桐野 実緒, 山崎 晴名, 山口 絢子, 山根 裕美子, 立脇 聡子, 広門 未知子, 近藤 恵, 池澤 善郎

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2023.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Arerugī Allergy
#74
of 490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,331
of 430,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arerugī Allergy
#25
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 490 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.