The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 165 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An introduction to decision science for conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Biology, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1111/cobi.13868 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Victoria Hemming, Abbey E. Camaclang, Megan S. Adams, Mark Burgman, Katherine Carbeck, Josie Carwardine, Iadine Chadès, Lia Chalifour, Sarah J. Converse, Lindsay N. K. Davidson, Georgia E. Garrard, Riley Finn, Jesse R. Fleri, Jacqueline Huard, Helen J. Mayfield, Eve McDonald Madden, Ilona Naujokaitis‐Lewis, Hugh P. Possingham, Libby Rumpff, Michael C. Runge, Daniel Stewart, Vivitskaia J. D. Tulloch, Terry Walshe, Tara G. Martin |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 25 | 15% |
| Canada | 15 | 9% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 2% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Curaçao | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 100 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 89 | 54% |
| Scientists | 71 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 242 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 44 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 17% |
| Other | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 14% |
| Unknown | 73 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 80 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 53 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Unknown | 80 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#418,482
of 26,453,397 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#200
of 4,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,482
of 534,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,453,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 534,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.