Victoria Hemming, Abbey E. Camaclang, Megan S. Adams, Mark Burgman, Katherine Carbeck, Josie Carwardine, Iadine Chadès, Lia Chalifour, Sarah J. Converse, Lindsay N. K. Davidson, Georgia E. Garrard, Riley Finn, Jesse R. Fleri, Jacqueline Huard, Helen J. Mayfield, Eve McDonald Madden, Ilona Naujokaitis‐Lewis, Hugh P. Possingham, Libby Rumpff, Michael C. Runge, Daniel Stewart, Vivitskaia J. D. Tulloch, Terry Walshe, Tara G. Martin
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#428,156
of 26,599,665 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#209
of 4,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,671
of 535,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,599,665 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 535,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
