↓ Skip to main content

Technical History of Barley-Shochu

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF THE BREWING SOCIETY OF JAPAN, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Technical History of Barley-Shochu
Published in
JOURNAL OF THE BREWING SOCIETY OF JAPAN, January 2008
DOI 10.6013/jbrewsocjapan1988.103.532
Authors

Naoto OKAZAKI, Masahiko SHIMODA

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2022.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF THE BREWING SOCIETY OF JAPAN
#69
of 400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,163
of 170,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF THE BREWING SOCIETY OF JAPAN
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 400 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.