The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 115 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Towards a better future for biodiversity and people: Modelling Nature Futures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102681 |
| Authors |
HyeJin Kim, Garry D. Peterson, William W.L. Cheung, Simon Ferrier, Rob Alkemade, Almut Arneth, Jan J. Kuiper, Sana Okayasu, Laura Pereira, Lilibeth A. Acosta, Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer, Eefje den Belder, Tyler D. Eddy, Justin A Johnson, Sylvia Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, Marcel T.J. Kok, Paul Leadley, David Leclère, Carolyn J. Lundquist, Carlo Rondinini, Robert J. Scholes, Machteld A. Schoolenberg, Yunne-Jai Shin, Elke Stehfest, Fabrice Stephenson, Piero Visconti, Detlef van Vuuren, Colette C.C. Wabnitz, Juan José Alava, Ivon Cuadros-Casanova, Kathryn K. Davies, Maria A. Gasalla, Ghassen Halouani, Mike Harfoot, Shizuka Hashimoto, Thomas Hickler, Tim Hirsch, Grigory Kolomytsev, Brian W. Miller, Haruka Ohashi, Maria Gabriela Palomo, Alexander Popp, Roy Paco Remme, Osamu Saito, U. Rashid Sumalia, Simon Willcock, Henrique M. Pereira |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 14 | 12% |
| Netherlands | 6 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 80 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 93 | 81% |
| Scientists | 20 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 165 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 16% |
| Unknown | 53 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 46 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 68 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#604,907
of 26,558,362 outputs
Outputs from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#222
of 2,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,307
of 365,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#6
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,558,362 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.