↓ Skip to main content

Towards a better future for biodiversity and people: Modelling Nature Futures

Overview of attention for article published in Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, September 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
118 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Towards a better future for biodiversity and people: Modelling Nature Futures
Published in
Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, September 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102681
Authors

HyeJin Kim, Garry D. Peterson, William W.L. Cheung, Simon Ferrier, Rob Alkemade, Almut Arneth, Jan J. Kuiper, Sana Okayasu, Laura Pereira, Lilibeth A. Acosta, Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer, Eefje den Belder, Tyler D. Eddy, Justin A Johnson, Sylvia Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, Marcel T.J. Kok, Paul Leadley, David Leclère, Carolyn J. Lundquist, Carlo Rondinini, Robert J. Scholes, Machteld A. Schoolenberg, Yunne-Jai Shin, Elke Stehfest, Fabrice Stephenson, Piero Visconti, Detlef van Vuuren, Colette C.C. Wabnitz, Juan José Alava, Ivon Cuadros-Casanova, Kathryn K. Davies, Maria A. Gasalla, Ghassen Halouani, Mike Harfoot, Shizuka Hashimoto, Thomas Hickler, Tim Hirsch, Grigory Kolomytsev, Brian W. Miller, Haruka Ohashi, Maria Gabriela Palomo, Alexander Popp, Roy Paco Remme, Osamu Saito, U. Rashid Sumalia, Simon Willcock, Henrique M. Pereira

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 118 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 169 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 13%
Student > Master 15 9%
Other 9 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 53 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 46 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 12%
Unspecified 8 5%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 68 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2024.
All research outputs
#590,742
of 26,622,753 outputs
Outputs from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#217
of 2,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,068
of 366,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#6
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,622,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.