You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dietary Guidelines Meet NOVA: Developing a Menu for A Healthy Dietary Pattern Using Ultra-Processed Foods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nutrition, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.06.028 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie M Hess, Madeline E Comeau, Shanon Casperson, Joanne L Slavin, Guy H Johnson, Mark Messina, Susan Raatz, Angela J Scheett, Anne Bodensteiner, Daniel G Palmer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 183 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| India | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 137 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 127 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 31 | 17% |
| Scientists | 22 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 25 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 404. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2024.
All research outputs
#76,993
of 26,194,269 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nutrition
#90
of 10,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,799
of 385,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nutrition
#2
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,194,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.