↓ Skip to main content

「魅力ある教材」設計・開発の枠組みについて : ARCS動機づけモデルを中心に

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Educational Media Research, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
「魅力ある教材」設計・開発の枠組みについて : ARCS動機づけモデルを中心に
Published in
Japanese Journal of Educational Media Research, July 2017
DOI 10.24458/jaems.1.1_50
Authors

鈴木 克明

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2024.
All research outputs
#21,381,047
of 26,243,859 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Educational Media Research
#19
of 32 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,788
of 330,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Educational Media Research
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one scored the same or higher as 13 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.