↓ Skip to main content

A Novel Method for Evaluating Viscosity and Viscoelasticity of Liquid Foods by a Non-Rotational Concentric Cylinder Setup

Overview of attention for article published in Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi, January 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Novel Method for Evaluating Viscosity and Viscoelasticity of Liquid Foods by a Non-Rotational Concentric Cylinder Setup
Published in
Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi, January 1999
DOI 10.3136/nskkk.46.657
Authors

Kanichi SUZUKI

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi
#113
of 675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,978
of 110,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 675 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.