The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
INFLUENCE OF MUSCLE FIBER COMPOSITION AND MUSCLE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA ON MAXIMAL ISOMETRIC STRENGTH
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness & Sports Medicine, January 1986
|
| DOI | 10.7600/jspfsm1949.35.168 |
| Authors |
TOMOO RYUSHI, TETSUO FUKUNAGA |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 33% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 67% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#23,195,360
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness & Sports Medicine
#210
of 229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,729
of 42,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness & Sports Medicine
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 229 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.