↓ Skip to main content

万葉集の食物文化考 I

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Obihiro Otani Junior College, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
万葉集の食物文化考 I
Published in
Bulletin of Obihiro Otani Junior College, June 2017
DOI 10.20682/oojc.27.0_43
Authors

高橋 まち子, 池添 博彦

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2024.
All research outputs
#8,969,070
of 26,447,081 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Obihiro Otani Junior College
#3
of 35 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,834
of 336,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Obihiro Otani Junior College
#3
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,447,081 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one scored the same or higher as 32 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.