The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mutagenicity study (Ames test) of toothpaste ingredients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Society of Cosmetic Chemists of Japan, January 1985
|
| DOI | 10.5107/sccj.19.100 |
| Authors |
Mitsuru Haresaku, Junzo Nabeshima, Kaoru Ishigaki, Noriko Hashimoto, Yukari Toyoda |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Society of Cosmetic Chemists of Japan
#5
of 115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,645
of 39,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Society of Cosmetic Chemists of Japan
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 115 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them