↓ Skip to main content

Mutagenicity study (Ames test) of toothpaste ingredients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Society of Cosmetic Chemists of Japan, January 1985
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 119)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mutagenicity study (Ames test) of toothpaste ingredients
Published in
Journal of Society of Cosmetic Chemists of Japan, January 1985
DOI 10.5107/sccj.19.100
Authors

Mitsuru Haresaku, Junzo Nabeshima, Kaoru Ishigaki, Noriko Hashimoto, Yukari Toyoda

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2012.
All research outputs
#9,015,488
of 26,561,164 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Society of Cosmetic Chemists of Japan
#16
of 119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,505
of 39,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Society of Cosmetic Chemists of Japan
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,561,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them