You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic Review of Observational Studies with Dose-Response Meta-Analysis between Folate Intake and Status Biomarkers in Adults and the Elderly
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1159/000490003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Romana Novaković, Anouk Geelen, Danijela Ristić-Medić, Marina Nikolić, Olga W. Souverein, Helene McNulty, Maresa Duffy, Leane Hoey, Carla Dullemeijer, Jacoba M.S. Renkema, Mirjana Gurinović, Marija Glibetić, Lisette C.P.G.M. de Groot, Pieter van’t Veer |
| Abstract |
Dietary reference values for folate intake vary widely across Europe. MEDLINE and Embase through November 2016 were searched for data on the association between folate intake and biomarkers (serum/plasma folate, red blood cell [RBC] folate, plasma homocysteine) from observational studies in healthy adults and elderly. The regression coefficient of biomarkers on intake (β) was extracted from each study, and the overall and stratified pooled β and SE (β) were obtained by random effects meta-analysis on a double log scale. These dose-response estimates may be used to derive folate intake reference values. For every doubling in folate intake, the changes in serum/plasma folate, RBC folate and plasma homocysteine were +22, +21, and -16% respectively. The overall pooled regression coefficients were β = 0.29 (95% CI 0.21-0.37) for serum/plasma folate (26 estimates from 17 studies), β = 0.28 (95% CI 0.21-0.36) for RBC (13 estimates from 11 studies), and β = -0.21 (95% CI -0.31 to -0.11) for plasma homocysteine (10 estimates from 6 studies). These estimates along with those from randomized controlled trials can be used for underpinning dietary recommendations for folate in adults and elderly. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 14% |
| India | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Austria | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2018.
All research outputs
#6,955,569
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism
#457
of 1,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,002
of 329,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.