↓ Skip to main content

国民精神文化研究所の研究 : 戦時下教学刷新における「精研」の役割・機能について

Overview of attention for article published in STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF EDUCATION, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
国民精神文化研究所の研究 : 戦時下教学刷新における「精研」の役割・機能について
Published in
STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF EDUCATION, June 2017
DOI 10.15062/kyouikushigaku.25.0_53
Authors

前田 一男

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,529,883
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF EDUCATION
#5
of 81 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,194
of 331,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF EDUCATION
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 81 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.