↓ Skip to main content

食卓で学ぶ甲殻類のからだのつくり : エビ・カニ・シャコ類の教材化に関する研究

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education, Hiroshima University Part II, Arts and science education, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
食卓で学ぶ甲殻類のからだのつくり : エビ・カニ・シャコ類の教材化に関する研究
Published in
Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education, Hiroshima University Part II, Arts and science education, December 2007
DOI 10.15027/22762
Authors

Ko Tomikawa, Kenji Torigoe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,304,862
of 26,115,614 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education, Hiroshima University Part II, Arts and science education
#5
of 29 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,655
of 170,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education, Hiroshima University Part II, Arts and science education
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,115,614 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one scored the same or higher as 24 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them