The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hybrid motion planning approach for robot dexterous hands
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1678-58782009000400002 |
| Authors |
Glauco A. P. Caurin, Leonardo M. Pedro |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 22% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 4 | 44% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 22% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering
#12
of 132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,422
of 176,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them