↓ Skip to main content

Concentration of Malondialdehyde in Subjects Living at High Altitudes: Exploratory Study.

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Concentration of Malondialdehyde in Subjects Living at High Altitudes: Exploratory Study.
Published in
Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública, January 2017
DOI 10.17843/rpmesp.2017.344.2830
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ingrid Gaby Melgarejo Pomar, Elfride Balanza Erquicia, Lizeth Torrez Colmena, Sergio Quisberth Barrera, Pilar Leina Suzaño Vargas

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), an oxidative stress biomarker, in individuals living at high altitudes (3500-4200 m). This exploratory study evaluated 91 subjects from La Paz and El Alto using a questionnaire and clinical examination. MDA levels were measured using a colorimetric technique. Measures of central tendency, dispersion, and percentages were used to describe data, and the Mann-Whitney test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to assess differences between the sexes, age groups, and altitudes. The median concentration of MDA was 4.1 μmol/L (RIC 2.4-5.4) and the highest concentration of MDA was found in individuals older than 40 years. The average MDA levels were higher than those found at sea level, a result we believe is due to the effect of hypoxia. However, there were no differences in the MDA levels between the sexes or age groups.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 10 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 10%
Chemistry 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 10 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública
#370
of 458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#362,584
of 421,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 458 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.