The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Geopolitical Inhomogeneities in the Registered Voters’ Distribution and Their Influence in the Voters’ Participation Ratio Distribution: The Mexican Case
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics, April 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fams.2021.518371 |
Authors |
H. Hernández-Saldaña |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 2 | 29% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 57% |
Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,813,299
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
#37
of 343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,784
of 435,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 343 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.