↓ Skip to main content

Dual-Mediation Paths Linking Corporate Social Responsibility to Employee’s Job Performance: A Multilevel Approach

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dual-Mediation Paths Linking Corporate Social Responsibility to Employee’s Job Performance: A Multilevel Approach
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.612565
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miaoying Fang, Peng Fan, Surya Nepal, Po-Chien Chang

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 6%
Researcher 3 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 25 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 18 34%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 26 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2021.
All research outputs
#20,687,221
of 23,283,373 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#24,815
of 30,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#432,354
of 506,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#810
of 932 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,283,373 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,916 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 932 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.