The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Filosofia, gênero e ciência: entrevista com Eulalia Pérez Sedeño
|
---|---|
Published in |
Estudos Feministas, August 2009
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0104-026x2009000100010 |
Authors |
Cristina Tavares da Costa Rocha, Miriam Pillar Grossi |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 38% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 25% |
Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 2 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 13% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 13% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 13% |
Psychology | 1 | 13% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Estudos Feministas
#152
of 497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,167
of 105,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Estudos Feministas
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 497 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.