↓ Skip to main content

Long-term antidepressant use: patient perspectives of benefits and adverse effects

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 1,781)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
47 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
81 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
321 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-term antidepressant use: patient perspectives of benefits and adverse effects
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, July 2016
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s110632
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire Cartwright, Kerry Gibson, John Read, Ondria Cowan, Tamsin Dehar

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 321 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 319 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 78 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 9%
Student > Master 26 8%
Researcher 22 7%
Other 19 6%
Other 42 13%
Unknown 106 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 53 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 8%
Neuroscience 21 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 4%
Other 52 16%
Unknown 113 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 466. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2024.
All research outputs
#62,447
of 26,605,615 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#2
of 1,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,262
of 366,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#1
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,605,615 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.