The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Subducting oceanic basement roughness impacts on upper-plate tectonic structure and a backstop splay fault zone activated in the southern Kodiak aftershock region of the Mw 9.2, 1964 megathrust rupture, Alaska
|
---|---|
Published in |
Geosphere, February 2021
|
DOI | 10.1130/ges02275.1 |
Authors |
Anne Krabbenhoeft, Roland von Huene, John J. Miller, Dirk Klaeschen |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 43% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
Professor | 1 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Researcher | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 71% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,884,333
of 23,285,523 outputs
Outputs from Geosphere
#472
of 779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,176
of 418,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geosphere
#11
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,285,523 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.