The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Hemorragia digestiva alta en paciente con cistoadenoma mucinoso de páncreas
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista chilena de cirugía, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.rchic.2016.08.003 |
Authors |
Fabián González V., Aníbal Pinto L. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 22% |
Professor | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 22% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 11% |
Psychology | 1 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,924,273
of 26,316,305 outputs
Outputs from Revista chilena de cirugía
#15
of 101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,477
of 427,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista chilena de cirugía
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,316,305 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them