The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 384 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Climate related sea-level variations over the past two millennia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1015619108 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew C. Kemp, Benjamin P. Horton, Jeffrey P. Donnelly, Michael E. Mann, Martin Vermeer, Stefan Rahmstorf |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 86 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 3% |
| Germany | 10 | 3% |
| Canada | 9 | 2% |
| France | 7 | 2% |
| Australia | 5 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 4 | 1% |
| Sweden | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 16 | 4% |
| Unknown | 231 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 289 | 75% |
| Scientists | 66 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 20 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 577 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 3% |
| Germany | 10 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Jamaica | 2 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 2% |
| Unknown | 523 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 124 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 98 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 67 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 8% |
| Professor | 43 | 7% |
| Other | 122 | 21% |
| Unknown | 75 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 200 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 116 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 60 | 10% |
| Engineering | 33 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 2% |
| Other | 58 | 10% |
| Unknown | 97 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 528. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#50,707
of 26,571,961 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1,295
of 105,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120
of 129,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#3
of 800 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,571,961 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 800 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.