↓ Skip to main content

Learning to Fail Better: Reflections on the Challenges and Risks of Community-Based Participatory Mental Health Research With Inuit Youth in Nunavut

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Learning to Fail Better: Reflections on the Challenges and Risks of Community-Based Participatory Mental Health Research With Inuit Youth in Nunavut
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, March 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2021.604668
Pubmed ID
Authors

Polina Anang, Nora Gottlieb, Suzanne Putulik, Shelley Iguptak, Ellen Gordon

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 27 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 14%
Social Sciences 7 12%
Psychology 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 29 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2021.
All research outputs
#15,143,188
of 23,289,753 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#4,233
of 10,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,858
of 423,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#202
of 411 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,289,753 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 411 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.