↓ Skip to main content

Age-related neuronal loss in the rat brain starts at the end of adolescence

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Age-related neuronal loss in the rat brain starts at the end of adolescence
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnana.2012.00045
Pubmed ID
Authors

Priscilla Morterá, Suzana Herculano-Houzel

Abstract

Aging-related changes in the brain have been mostly studied through the comparison of young adult and very old animals. However, aging must be considered a lifelong process of cumulative changes that ultimately become evident at old age. To determine when this process of decline begins, we studied how the cellular composition of the rat brain changes from infancy to adolescence, early adulthood, and old age. Using the isotropic fractionator to determine total numbers of neuronal and non-neuronal cells in different brain areas, we find that a major increase in number of neurons occurs during adolescence, between 1 and 2-3 months of age, followed by a significant trend of widespread and progressive neuronal loss that begins as early as 3 months of age, when neuronal numbers are maximal in all structures, until decreases in numbers of neurons become evident at 12 or 22 months of age. Our findings indicate that age-related decline in the brain begins as soon as the end of adolescence, a novel finding has important clinical and social implications for public health and welfare.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 3%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Iraq 1 <1%
Unknown 102 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Other 22 20%
Unknown 14 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 27%
Neuroscience 22 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Psychology 5 5%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 21 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2012.
All research outputs
#19,063,669
of 24,278,128 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#907
of 1,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,322
of 251,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#25
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,278,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,221 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.