↓ Skip to main content

出版における言説構成過程の一事例分析 ―「江戸時代の識字率は高かった」という“常識”を例として

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japan Society of Publishing Studies, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
出版における言説構成過程の一事例分析 ―「江戸時代の識字率は高かった」という“常識”を例として
Published in
Journal of the Japan Society of Publishing Studies, October 2020
DOI 10.24756/jshuppan.48.0_1
Authors

清水 一彦

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,898,017
of 26,534,649 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japan Society of Publishing Studies
#4
of 40 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,226
of 446,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japan Society of Publishing Studies
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,534,649 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 40 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one scored the same or higher as 36 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.