The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Challenges and Prospects of New Plant Breeding Techniques for GABA Improvement in Crops: Tomato as an Example
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2020.577980 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Pietro Gramazio, Mariko Takayama, Hiroshi Ezura |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
Researcher | 10 | 13% |
Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 15% |
Unknown | 32 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 28% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 11% |
Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 35 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#15,681,103
of 23,302,246 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#11,243
of 21,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,095
of 399,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#275
of 412 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,302,246 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,112 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 412 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.