The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cannabis-Induced Hypodopaminergic Anhedonia and Cognitive Decline in Humans: Embracing Putative Induction of Dopamine Homeostasis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, March 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.623403 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kenneth Blum, Jag Khalsa, Jean Lud Cadet, David Baron, Abdalla Bowirrat, Brent Boyett, Lisa Lott, Raymond Brewer, Marjorie Gondré-Lewis, Gregory Bunt, Shan Kazmi, Mark S. Gold |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 18 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 95% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 14% |
Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
Researcher | 3 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 24 | 49% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 7 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Unknown | 25 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2024.
All research outputs
#1,424,320
of 26,596,651 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#874
of 13,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,607
of 461,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#46
of 489 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,596,651 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 489 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.